Caching Strategies Explained: Cache-Aside, Write-Through and Write-Back
Caching strategies and their trade-offs: cache-aside, read-through, write-through, write-back and write-around, plus eviction policies, TTLs and invalidation.
How idempotency keys make retries safe: why duplicate requests happen, how to store and check keys, handling concurrent requests, expiry and common mistakes.

A customer taps “Pay”. The request reaches your server and the payment succeeds, but the response is lost on a flaky mobile connection. The app retries. Without protection, you charge them twice. Idempotency keys prevent that.
An operation is idempotent if doing it several times has the same effect as doing it once. HTTP GET, PUT and DELETE are designed to be idempotent; POST usually isn’t. Payments, orders and message sends need extra design to become safe to retry. Multi-service flows such as orders often use the saga pattern, where every step must be idempotent.
Idempotency-Key.def create_payment(req, key):
record = store.get(key)
if record and record.done:
return record.response
if not store.claim(key): # atomic insert; fails if another request holds the key
return conflict("request in progress")
response = charge_card(req)
store.complete(key, response, ttl_hours=24)
return response
For queue consumers, record the IDs of processed messages, or design updates so repeating them is harmless, like setting a status rather than incrementing a counter.
Payments, order creation, notification sending and any API behind rate limits that clients retry with backoff.
The client, once per logical operation, reusing it for every retry of that operation.
Long enough to cover retries and delayed redeliveries, typically 24 hours or so, depending on your system.
No. Delivery may still happen more than once; idempotency makes the effect happen once.
Every article is edited by a human and checked against our editorial policy. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.
Caching strategies and their trade-offs: cache-aside, read-through, write-through, write-back and write-around, plus eviction policies, TTLs and invalidation.
Rate limiting algorithms compared: fixed window, sliding log, sliding window counter, token bucket and leaky bucket, with code and distributed design tips.
Kafka, RabbitMQ and Amazon SQS compared: log vs queue models, ordering, replay, throughput, delivery guarantees and operations, and when to use each.